Module 19 - Electronic Navigation

Advanced Scenario Check: Electronics

What you will learn

Run a compound route, traffic and GNSS-failure decision without allowing one attractive electronic picture to consume the last safe option.

Advanced electronic-navigation decisions combine position integrity, chart status, route geometry, collision evidence, depth margin, crew workload and a fallback. Solving only the sensor fault is not enough.

A fictional yacht is approaching a narrow entrance at night. GNSS and the copied route are suspect; one AIS target has stale manual dimensions; radar shows a second unlabelled echo; depth is trending shallower; and the route's cross-track alarm is set wider than the safe corridor. The safe decision cannot be found by choosing one preferred screen.

Start by closing the route whose position and alarm assumptions are no longer valid. Keep the yacht in the pre-briefed sea-room or holding area, maintain safe speed and lookout, and separate collision assessment from route troubleshooting. AIS remains supplementary; radar and visual or auditory evidence still require their own systematic assessment.

Rebuild position from the last accepted fix and checked observations with different failure modes. Recalculate the clearance and contour settings from the vessel and current assumptions, then inspect every route leg and turn at useful scales. If the entrance cannot be reopened with a coherent picture and usable margin, divert or wait rather than forcing the original plan.

This written scenario rehearses reasoning, not practical competence. A real decision depends on the fitted equipment, vessel manoeuvrability, tide, charted dangers, traffic, visibility, crew and skipper judgement.

Keep the compound problem separated

The crew are tempted to fix the GNSS first even though a closing radar echo and shrinking depth margin need immediate ownership.

  1. 1. Control the vessel

    Use safe heading, speed and sea room; maintain lookout, radar and collision-risk assessment.

  2. 2. Close invalid assumptions

    Suspend the route, alarm corridor and automation that depend on suspect position or configuration.

  3. 3. Rebuild in parallel

    One role reconstructs position and clearance while helm and lookout keep the live risks controlled.

  4. 4. Choose the gate

    Reopen only with coherent evidence and margin; otherwise hold, divert or wait.

Sense check: The navigation team should be able to name which risk is being controlled now and which evidence is required for the next decision.

Common mistake or limitation

  • Fixing the electronics is not the first priority when vessel motion, traffic or clearance is unsafe.
  • A stale AIS dimension or status can distort a CPA picture even when the target name looks convincing.
  • A cross-track alarm wider than the safe corridor is not a usable route barrier.
  • Reopening a route because the screens agree again repeats the original common-source error unless integrity is independently checked.

Recap

  • Control vessel motion, traffic assessment and clearance before troubleshooting.
  • Close routes and alarms whose source assumptions have failed.
  • Rebuild position, chart and route evidence with different failure modes.
  • Hold, divert or wait when the entrance cannot be reopened with a coherent margin.

Optional quick check

Section 18 of 18

During the compound failure, what must remain separate from GNSS troubleshooting?

Choose one answer
Sources and factual review

Reviewed 20 August 2026 - Compass Revision editorial review.

Continue studying Electronic Navigation

This public lesson is part of Revision Module 19. Full revision access adds the guided Learn, Practise and Test flow, flashcards and revision progress.