Module 6 - Position, Course & Speed

GNSS Limitations and Cross-Checks

What you will learn

Interpret GNSS accuracy, DOP and integrity indications without overclaiming them, then design a position cross-check that does not repeat the same failure mode.

GNSS is powerful but its precision is conditional. Geometry, signal environment, receiver settings, datum, chart data, antenna position and interference must all survive independent checking.

MCA guidance reports that GNSS commonly produces horizontal accuracy around 5–25 m for 95% of observations, while stressing that equipment, augmentation, antenna view and environment change the result. Navigate to inherent accuracy and safety margin, not the number of displayed decimals.

HDOP describes how satellite geometry scales horizontal ranging uncertainty. Lower is generally favourable geometry, but there is no portable pass/fail value that proves a trustworthy position across receivers and situations. Actual error also depends on ranging error, atmosphere, multipath, receiver processing and antenna environment. HDOP does not validate a chart, waypoint, datum or signal integrity.

Multipath is a reflected-signal path that can bias range in harbours, near cliffs, structures or large vessels. Jamming can deny or degrade the signal; spoofing can create a plausible wrong position. A GNSS-fed chart, radar overlay, AIS display and second screen may all inherit one wrong position, so display count is not source independence.

RAIM or other receiver integrity monitoring compares redundant measurements against a receiver-specific threshold and may raise an integrity warning. Availability and behaviour depend on equipment, satellite geometry and configuration. A clear indication reduces one class of concern but cannot prove the waypoint, chart, antenna offset, datum or absence of sophisticated interference.

Worked example

A receiver reports an illustrative horizontal ranging-error estimate of 4 m and HDOP 2.5.

  1. 1Approximate geometry-propagated horizontal uncertainty = 4 × 2.5 = 10 m.
  2. 2Treat 10 m as an illustrative geometry calculation, not a guaranteed error circle.
  3. 3Add the separate decision risks: datum, antenna offset, chart quality, waypoint entry, multipath and interference.
  4. 4Choose an independent check and margin appropriate to the nearby hazards rather than declaring the fix safe from HDOP alone.

Sense check: Lower HDOP would reduce the geometry multiplier in this model, but it cannot turn a wrong waypoint or spoofed signal into a correct one.

GNSS Limitations and Cross-Checks
HDOPHorizontal satellite geometry multiplierSignal integrity or correct chart/waypoint
RAIM/integrity stateReceiver consistency against its thresholdEvery failure mode is absent
Second GNSS displayPresentation or receiver comparisonIndependence when source/signals are shared
Radar/visual/depthDifferent physical evidenceSafety unless identity, references and uncertainty are checked

Respond to a plausible position conflict

GNSS places the yacht on the planned track, but a radar range and the depth trend both disagree in the same direction.

  1. 1. Do not vote by screen count

    Identify whether plotter, overlay and AIS presentation all depend on the same GNSS position.

  2. 2. Protect the vessel

    Increase margin, reduce speed or move towards known safe water according to the passage plan while the conflict is investigated.

  3. 3. Check the chain

    Review datum, antenna offset, satellite/integrity status, chart scale/currency and independent radar, visual and depth evidence.

Sense check: Two independent observations agreeing against one common electronic source deserve action before a perfect explanation is available.

Common mistake or limitation

  • Treating a fixed HDOP threshold as a universal declaration of a reliable position.
  • Calling two displays independent when both use one antenna or position feed.
  • Assuming no receiver alarm proves the waypoint, chart, datum and signal are correct.

Recap

  • GNSS accuracy is conditional on system, receiver and environment.
  • DOP and integrity monitoring answer narrower questions than overall trust.
  • Common-source failures can spread across several displays.
  • Cross-check with genuinely different evidence and protect the danger-side uncertainty.

Optional quick check

Section 7 of 10

What does a low HDOP most directly support?

Choose one answer
Sources and factual review

Reviewed 20 August 2026 - Compass Revision editorial review.

Continue studying Position, Course & Speed

This public lesson is part of Revision Module 6. Full revision access adds the guided Learn, Practise and Test flow, flashcards and revision progress.